<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Snubs Gamers, calls gaming an ancillary service of broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voxexmachina.com/news/att-snubs-gamers-calls-gaming-an-ancillary-service-of-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voxexmachina.com/news/att-snubs-gamers-calls-gaming-an-ancillary-service-of-broadband/</link>
	<description>Video Games Have A Voice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isky</title>
		<link>http://www.voxexmachina.com/news/att-snubs-gamers-calls-gaming-an-ancillary-service-of-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Isky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voxexmachina.com/news/att-snubs-gamers-calls-gaming-an-ancillary-service-of-broadband/#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate being on wireless internet from .. of all names.. Skynet. They provide me a range of speeds I&#039;m going to get for $50 per month. Because of some difficulties in where I live, most prominent being my huge barn, I typically get slower than average at 1.5-2mbps down and 512kbps up. Sometimes I get more. I rarely get less. I can run servers, download huge files, anything I want. The caveat is that I&#039;m not supposed to go over 10G of transfer per month. However, if I don&#039;t do it often, they let that slide as well - as long as I&#039;m not causing problems for other users in my area. 
This is the benefit to having a small local provider that even makes its own equipment. They are more willing to look at individual situations than just enforce a set of rules with no allowances. 
And, I get better service than what the big companies offer, and now want to restrict based on type of download and upload. It&#039;s ridiculous. 
I completely agree with Helvetica. Bandwidth is bandwidth. How I use it should be up to me, not them, as long as it&#039;s not something illegal like child porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate being on wireless internet from .. of all names.. Skynet. They provide me a range of speeds I&#8217;m going to get for $50 per month. Because of some difficulties in where I live, most prominent being my huge barn, I typically get slower than average at 1.5-2mbps down and 512kbps up. Sometimes I get more. I rarely get less. I can run servers, download huge files, anything I want. The caveat is that I&#8217;m not supposed to go over 10G of transfer per month. However, if I don&#8217;t do it often, they let that slide as well &#8211; as long as I&#8217;m not causing problems for other users in my area.<br />
This is the benefit to having a small local provider that even makes its own equipment. They are more willing to look at individual situations than just enforce a set of rules with no allowances.<br />
And, I get better service than what the big companies offer, and now want to restrict based on type of download and upload. It&#8217;s ridiculous.<br />
I completely agree with Helvetica. Bandwidth is bandwidth. How I use it should be up to me, not them, as long as it&#8217;s not something illegal like child porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

